Analysis snapshotSnapshot decision:REVIEW

Bertin Precellys 24 Tissue Homogenizer — Auction Analysis

The unit looks physically complete and closed at $100, but appearance does not establish the loaded high-speed operation needed to support a positive reseller bid.

Analysis snapshot · Historical — observed August 24, 2026. This retrospective reconstruction uses the documented final auction price and was not published before the auction closed.

Decision at a glance

RecommendationREVIEW
Maximum hammer bid
$0

The auction bid ceiling supported by this analysis, if one is defensible; see costs below for buyer-premium treatment.

Why this decision

At the $100 hammer, the blind model produces only $12.50 modeled profit and fails the required return. A proper loaded high-speed run would support a conditional ceiling around $370.

What to verify before bidding

  • Visual completeness is not operating evidence.
Review all risks and unknowns

See costs and maximum bid for the displayed assumptions and buyer-premium treatment.

Final auction price
$100
Bidders
1
Blind-model resale
$1,250
Snapshot provenance and timing · observed August 24, 2026 · scheduled close August 24, 2026

GSA Auctions sale 3-1-QSC-I-26-537, lot 031 · Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Snapshot observed August 24, 2026
Scheduled close August 24, 2026
Analysis prepared August 24, 2026
Published August 24, 2026 · page updated September 20, 2026

Prepared and published by Oleksii Udod for LotCaliper.

Continue after this auction

This auction snapshot is historical. Continue with related research, or review a relevant published analysis whose recorded scheduled close has not passed.

These are individually prepared, time-stamped analyses with recorded scheduled closes. Verify the official auction before acting.

Auction snapshot

This GSA Auctions lot contains one Bertin Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer. It closed at $100 with one bidder. The seller describes it as used, approximately 18 years old, untested, and sold as-is, with operational status unknown; inspection was available.

Visible completeness supports identification, but only a meaningful loaded run can establish the operating state that drives resale value.

Review and correction history

Independent review not recorded for this legacy analysis. No corrections recorded.

View review and correction details

Independent review not recorded

Published before the current independent-review gate; no completed independent review is recorded.

How independent review works
How evidence is classified

Seller facts, photo-derived observations, manufacturer context, unknowns, and LotCaliper assumptions remain explicitly separated.

Source Confirmed

Source-confirmed

  • Used, untested, as-is, operational status unknown, inspection available, $100 final hammer, and one bidder.

Photo Derived

Photo-derived

  • Reference 03119.200.RD000 and manufacture year 2008.
  • Lid, handle, 24-position rotor, blocking plate, controls, power hardware, and intact exterior appear present.

Not Established

Not established

  • Power-on, display operation, vacuum locking, lid interlock, motor/bearing condition, speed regulation, or a loaded cycle.

Lotcaliper Assumption

LotCaliper assumptions

  • $1,000–1,250 current-state gross resale and $1,850 verified-working gross resale.
  • $0 blind ceiling and ~$370 only after a meaningful loaded test.

Equipment identity

Laboratory · quantity 1

Bertin Technologies Precellys 24 · reference 03119.200.RD000 · 2008

Identity confidence: High

Identity evidence
  • The rear data plate identifies the Precellys 24 reference and manufacture year; the serial number is intentionally omitted.

    GSA Auctions · Image · observed August 24, 2026

  • Official product-family context supports the 24-sample, high-speed bead-beating design and locking mechanism.

    Bertin Technologies · Text · observed August 24, 2026

    View official reference

Configuration

Lid, locking hardware, 24-position rotor, blocking plate, controls, and power hardware

Confirmed · High confidence

Configuration evidence
  • Photo-derived physical-completeness observation; not a functional test.

    GSA Auctions · Image · observed August 24, 2026

Condition

Untested

Used, approximately 18 years old, untested, sold as-is, and operational status unknown.

Evidence confidence: High

Condition evidence
  • GSA condition statement, paraphrased.

    GSA Auctions · Source Field · observed August 24, 2026

Market evidence

Market evidence strength

High

Public auditability

Limited Legacy

Evidence recency

Not Recorded

No structured comparable-evidence metadata was preserved for this dated snapshot. Public auditability is limited; the numeric resale snapshot cannot be independently audited from comparable records on this page.

Legacy evidence counts were not preserved. Unknown is not reported as zero.

Sensitivity and robustness

Requires Verification

The scenarios show potentially workable economics, but the stated verification gate must be resolved before bidding responsibly.

Untested, visually complete

Max hammer
$0
Gross resale model
$1,000–$1,250

No positive blind/as-is hammer clears the standard thresholds. Power-on does not resolve motor, locking, interlock, or high-speed stability risk.

Completes a meaningful loaded high-speed run

Max hammer
$370
Gross resale model
$1,850

Conditional working-state model; at a $100 hammer it produces about $773 profit and 97% ROI.

Costs and maximum bid

Transaction / operating costAmountBasis
Selling Fees$187.50LotCaliper assumption: 15% of modeled conservative resale proceeds.
Shipping$300LotCaliper pickup, packing, and inbound-logistics reserve; not a GSA or carrier quote.
Testing Repair Reserve$150LotCaliper cleaning, diagnostics, and functional-verification reserve.
Risk Buffer$500LotCaliper reserve for motor, bearings, vacuum locking, safety interlock, speed regulation, and control electronics.
Buyer premium
Not modeled
Return requirements
$500 minimum profit · 30% minimum ROI
Computed bid constraints

Profit floor: $0

ROI floor: $0

Binding: Profit and ROI floors

Snapshot blind/as-is max hammer
$0
Modeled result at recorded bid
$12.50 profit · 1.19% modeled ROI

This is a reseller ceiling, not a prediction of the auction's closing price. Any buyer premium or other unquoted acquisition charge must be deducted before bidding.

Exact unit identification

The rear data plate identifies a Bertin Technologies Precellys 24, reference 03119.200.RD000, manufactured in 2008. It is the original keypad/display generation rather than the later Precellys 24 Touch. The serial number is not published.

Official technical context describes a 24-sample bead-beating platform using 0.5 mL or 2 mL tubes and speeds up to roughly 6,800 rpm.

Blind/as-is economics

At $1,250 gross resale, selling costs and $950 of non-acquisition burden leave $112.50 before acquisition—far short of the $500 profit floor. Even at a zero-dollar hammer, the blind case fails, so the blind ceiling is $0.

At the actual $100 hammer, modeled profit under these assumptions is $12.50, not an expected actual profit.

Cost / requirementBlind model
Gross resale assumption$1,250
Selling cost$187.50
Pickup / packing / inbound$300
Testing / cleaning$150
Motor / vacuum / electronics risk$500
Minimum required profit / ROI$500 / 30%

What would change the decision?

A 5–10 minute loaded functional test is more valuable than more visual inspection or another asking-price comp.

  • Controls respond with no persistent fault code.
  • Balanced dummy tubes load and the lid/interlock and locking mechanism engage.
  • Low- and high-speed cycles complete without abnormal vibration, bearing noise, thermal faults, or release problems.
  • Several cycles complete consistently and logistics remain within reserve.

Recommendation and rationale

Snapshot decision

REVIEW

At the $100 hammer, the blind model produces only $12.50 modeled profit and fails the required return. A proper loaded high-speed run would support a conditional ceiling around $370.

Confidence

Identity
High
Configuration
High
Condition
Low
Market Support
High
Costs
High

Market support assesses how well the available evidence supports the resale assumption. Exact third-party marketplace records may be omitted when source-use rights are unclear. Each dimension uses the published methodology rubric; a confidence label measures the strength and boundedness of its evidence, not the likelihood of a profitable outcome.

Risks and unknowns

High · Loaded Run Not Verified

Visual completeness is not operating evidence.

The motor, bearings, locking mechanism, safety interlock, and speed regulation need a meaningful loaded test.

Sources

View cited public sources