Analysis snapshotSnapshot decision:BUY

Labomed UVD-2950 Spectrophotometer — Auction Analysis

A $25 observed bid leaves room under a $1,900 conservative resale model and $300 blind ceiling, but the seller's July power test and last-use statement are not current calibration or full performance proof.

Analysis snapshot · Historical — observed August 25, 2026. The scheduled close date of August 27, 2026 has passed. The price, evidence, economics, and recommendation remain exactly as recorded and are not current.

Decision at a glance

RecommendationBUY
Maximum hammer bid
$300

The auction bid ceiling supported by this analysis, if one is defensible; see costs below for buyer-premium treatment.

Why this decision

BUY below $300 if standalone operation, optics, lamp condition, and wavelength/performance tests support the conservative model.

See costs and maximum bid for the displayed assumptions and buyer-premium treatment.

Snapshot observed bid
$25
Bidders
1
Blind-model resale
$1,900
Snapshot provenance and timing · observed August 25, 2026 · scheduled close August 27, 2026

GSA Auctions sale 3-1-QSC-I-26-541, lot 004 · Gunnison, Colorado
Snapshot observed August 25, 2026
Scheduled close August 27, 2026
Analysis prepared August 25, 2026
Published August 26, 2026 · page updated August 26, 2026

Prepared and published by Oleksii Udod for LotCaliper.

Continue after this auction

This auction snapshot is historical. Continue with related research, or review a relevant published analysis whose recorded scheduled close has not passed.

These are individually prepared, time-stamped analyses with recorded scheduled closes. Verify the official auction before acting.

Auction snapshot

At the August 25, 2026 observation, the high bid was $25 with one bidder. The seller says the unit was power tested July 16, 2026 and workable at last use, but accessories and software are not included.

Manufacturer documentation supports standalone operation, so missing PC/software is a discount rather than fatal incompleteness; it does not prove performance or calibration.

Review and correction history

Independent review not recorded for this legacy analysis. No corrections recorded.

View review and correction details

Independent review not recorded

Published before the current independent-review gate; no completed independent review is recorded.

How independent review works
How evidence is classified

Seller facts, photo-derived observations, manufacturer context, unknowns, and LotCaliper assumptions remain explicitly separated.

Source Confirmed

Seller-confirmed

  • Power tested 2026-07-16.
  • Workable at last use; accessories and software not included.

Photo Derived

Photo-derived

  • Photos show physical completeness only, not performance.

Manufacturer Context

Manufacturer context

  • Manufacturer material supports standalone operation.

Lotcaliper Assumption

LotCaliper assumptions

  • $1,900 conservative gross resale.
  • $300 maximum hammer.

Equipment identity

Laboratory · quantity 1

Labomed UVD-2950 double-beam UV-Vis scanning spectrophotometer

Identity confidence: High

Identity evidence
  • Seller identifies a Labomed UVD-2950.

    GSA Auctions · Source Field · observed August 25, 2026

Configuration

Accessories and software (not included)

Seller excluded · High confidence

Configuration evidence
  • Seller indicates no accessories or software are included.

    GSA Auctions · Source Field · observed August 25, 2026

Condition

Powers On

Seller says the unit was power tested on 2026-07-16 and workable at last use; this is not a current calibration or complete performance test.

Evidence confidence: High

Condition evidence
  • Seller condition statement, paraphrased.

    GSA Auctions · Source Field · observed August 25, 2026

Market evidence

Market evidence strength

Medium Low

Public auditability

Limited Legacy

Evidence recency

Not Recorded

No structured comparable-evidence metadata was preserved for this dated snapshot. Public auditability is limited; the numeric resale snapshot cannot be independently audited from comparable records on this page.

Legacy evidence counts were not preserved. Unknown is not reported as zero.

Sensitivity and robustness

Survives

The published decision survives the selected downside check under the stated bounded assumptions.

$1,600 resale stress

Max hammer
$60
Gross resale model
$1,600

At the $25 observed bid, the stress case models about $535 profit and 64.8% ROI.

Economics at $300 hammer

Max hammer
$300
Gross resale model
$1,900

Models about $515 profit and 46.8% ROI at the maximum hammer.

Costs and maximum bid

Transaction / operating costAmountBasis
Selling Fees$285LotCaliper assumption: 15% of modeled conservative resale proceeds.
Shipping$250LotCaliper pickup, packing, and inbound-logistics reserve; not a GSA or carrier quote.
Testing Repair Reserve$450LotCaliper cleaning, diagnostics, and functional-verification reserve.
Risk Buffer$100LotCaliper reserve for pickup, packing, performance testing, lamp/basic service, and missing-accessory liquidity.
Buyer premium
Not modeled
Return requirements
$500 minimum profit · 30% minimum ROI
Computed bid constraints

Profit floor: $315

ROI floor: $442

Binding: Profit floor

Snapshot blind/as-is max hammer
$300
Modeled result at recorded bid
$790 profit · 95.80% modeled ROI

This is a reseller ceiling, not a prediction of the auction's closing price. Any buyer premium or other unquoted acquisition charge must be deducted before bidding.

Condition and economics

The $800 non-acquisition burden includes pickup, packing, testing, lamp/basic service, and missing-accessory liquidity reserves.

  • $1,600 stress ceiling: $60.
  • Do not treat seller power-on evidence as current calibration or full testing.

Recommendation and rationale

Snapshot decision

BUY

BUY below $300 if standalone operation, optics, lamp condition, and wavelength/performance tests support the conservative model.

Confidence

Identity
High
Configuration
High
Condition
Medium High
Market Support
Medium Low
Costs
Medium High

Market support assesses how well the available evidence supports the resale assumption. Exact third-party marketplace records may be omitted when source-use rights are unclear. Each dimension uses the published methodology rubric; a confidence label measures the strength and boundedness of its evidence, not the likelihood of a profitable outcome.

Risks and unknowns

Medium · Performance Not Verified

No current calibration or complete performance verification is established.

Seller power-test and last-use statements are narrower evidence.

Sources

View cited public sources