Analysis snapshotSnapshot decision:REVIEW

2× Dragos Ruggedized Sensors / SEL-3355-2 — Auction Analysis

Two $25 Dragos-branded appliances are photo-confirmed SEL-3355-2 industrial computers, but removed drives and unverified POST leave the blind max at $0 despite a positive percentage ROI.

Analysis snapshot · Historical — observed August 25, 2026. The scheduled close date of August 27, 2026 has passed. The price, evidence, economics, and recommendation remain exactly as recorded and are not current.

Decision at a glance

RecommendationREVIEW
Maximum hammer bid
$0

The auction bid ceiling supported by this analysis, if one is defensible; see costs below for buyer-premium treatment.

Why this decision

REVIEW: positive ROI at $25 does not satisfy the $500 absolute-profit floor. A tested pair could justify a conditional $100–175 ceiling.

What to verify before bidding

  • Removed drives eliminate storage value and do not establish a transferable software environment.
  • Blind absolute profit does not meet the $500 standard even at a $0 hammer.
Review all risks and unknowns

See costs and maximum bid for the displayed assumptions and buyer-premium treatment.

Snapshot observed bid
$25
Bidders
1
Blind-model resale
$750
Snapshot provenance and timing · observed August 25, 2026 · scheduled close August 27, 2026

GSA Auctions sale 3-1-QSC-I-26-541, lot 022 · Lakewood, Colorado
Snapshot observed August 25, 2026
Scheduled close August 27, 2026
Analysis prepared August 25, 2026
Published August 26, 2026 · page updated August 26, 2026

Prepared and published by Oleksii Udod for LotCaliper.

Continue after this auction

This auction snapshot is historical. Continue with related research, or review a relevant published analysis whose recorded scheduled close has not passed.

No related published analysis currently has a future scheduled close.

Auction snapshot

At the August 25, 2026 observation, the high bid was $25 with one bidder. Seller states the hard drives were removed; the underlying SEL-3355-2 hardware is photo-confirmed, while an exact Dragos SKU is not.

Enterprise cybersecurity deployment cost and subscription spend are not transferable used-hardware value, and a high ROI percentage cannot overcome an inadequate absolute-profit result.

Review and correction history

Independent review not recorded for this legacy analysis. No corrections recorded.

View review and correction details

Independent review not recorded

Published before the current independent-review gate; no completed independent review is recorded.

How independent review works
How evidence is classified

Seller facts, photo-derived observations, manufacturer context, unknowns, and LotCaliper assumptions remain explicitly separated.

Source Confirmed

Seller-confirmed

  • Two Dragos-branded appliances.
  • Hard drives removed.

Photo Derived

Photo-derived

  • Underlying SEL-3355-2 hardware.
  • No confirmed valuable optional expansion cards.

Manufacturer Context

Independent context

  • SEL support supports generic industrial-computer utility.
  • Dragos hardware and recurring subscription spending are separate context, not resale value.

Lotcaliper Assumption

LotCaliper assumptions

  • $750 blind gross resale for the pair.
  • $0 blind maximum; $100–175 only after both machines pass basic testing.

Equipment identity

Industrial Computing · quantity 2

Dragos / SEL SEL-3355-2 industrial computer

Identity confidence: High

Identity evidence
  • Underlying SEL-3355-2 hardware is photo-confirmed; exact Dragos NS-100-SEL SKU is not auction-confirmed.

    GSA Auctions · Image · observed August 25, 2026

Configuration

Dragos software, subscription/support entitlement, storage, and optional expansion-card value (assigned $0)

Not established · no source evidence establishes presence or absence

Configuration evidence
  • Hard drives are removed and auction evidence does not establish transferable software, support, or optional-card configuration.

    GSA Auctions · Source Field · observed August 25, 2026

Condition

Storage Media Removed

Seller states hard drives were removed; POST and basic hardware operation are not established.

Evidence confidence: High

Condition evidence
  • Seller condition statement, paraphrased.

    GSA Auctions · Source Field · observed August 25, 2026

Market evidence

Market evidence strength

Medium High

Public auditability

Limited Legacy

Evidence recency

Not Recorded

No structured comparable-evidence metadata was preserved for this dated snapshot. Public auditability is limited; the numeric resale snapshot cannot be independently audited from comparable records on this page.

Legacy evidence counts were not preserved. Unknown is not reported as zero.

Sensitivity and robustness

Requires Verification

The scenarios show potentially workable economics, but the stated verification gate must be resolved before bidding responsibly.

Blind/as-is case

Max hammer
$0
Gross resale model
$750

At $25, the blind model produces about $162.50 profit and 34.2% ROI, below the absolute-profit floor.

Tested pair conditional case

Max hammer
$175
Gross resale model
$1,100–$1,200

If both machines POST and pass basic hardware testing, the conditional maximum is about $100–175.

Costs and maximum bid

Transaction / operating costAmountBasis
Selling Fees$112.50LotCaliper assumption: 15% of modeled conservative resale proceeds.
Shipping$150LotCaliper pickup, packing, and inbound-logistics reserve; not a GSA or carrier quote.
Testing Repair Reserve$200LotCaliper cleaning, diagnostics, and functional-verification reserve.
Risk Buffer$100LotCaliper reserve for pickup, SSD replacement, bench test/OS preparation, condition, and liquidity.
Buyer premium
Not modeled
Return requirements
$500 minimum profit · 30% minimum ROI
Computed bid constraints

Profit floor: $0

ROI floor: $40

Binding: Profit floor

Snapshot blind/as-is max hammer
$0
Modeled result at recorded bid
$162.50 profit · 34.20% modeled ROI

This is a reseller ceiling, not a prediction of the auction's closing price. Any buyer premium or other unquoted acquisition charge must be deducted before bidding.

Blind and tested economics

The blind model reserves $450 beyond acquisition. At $25, ROI is about 34%, but profit is only about $162.50 and fails the $500 absolute-profit rule.

  • No storage, software, subscription, or optional-card value is assumed.
  • A tested $1,100–1,200 pair supports a conditional $100–175 maximum.

Recommendation and rationale

Snapshot decision

REVIEW

REVIEW: positive ROI at $25 does not satisfy the $500 absolute-profit floor. A tested pair could justify a conditional $100–175 ceiling.

Confidence

Identity
High
Configuration
High
Condition
Medium Low
Market Support
Medium High
Costs
High

Market support assesses how well the available evidence supports the resale assumption. Exact third-party marketplace records may be omitted when source-use rights are unclear. Each dimension uses the published methodology rubric; a confidence label measures the strength and boundedness of its evidence, not the likelihood of a profitable outcome.

Risks and unknowns

High · Storage Removed

Removed drives eliminate storage value and do not establish a transferable software environment.

Seller-confirmed drive removal.

High · Profit Floor Failure

Blind absolute profit does not meet the $500 standard even at a $0 hammer.

LotCaliper economics model.

Sources

View cited public sources